Jump to content


- - - - -

inflexible design


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 rutman

rutman

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts

Posted 17 November 2010 - 09:29 PM

The pyrocoil and dryer both use the gap space between nested cylinders for heat transfer.  I propose using the analogous gap between inner and outer downdraft reactors to heat incoming air, instead of using flex.

advantages:
no need for flex tube
elimination of possible dangerous leaks bet. air and hot process gas (eliminate all those connections bet. flex and pipes)
simpler flanges (none with large holes for 1/2" pipe)
possibly greater heat exchange bet. inc. cold air and reactor/process gas.

what do ya'll think?

Attached Files



#2 jimmason

jimmason

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 527 posts

Posted 21 November 2010 - 02:02 AM

rutman, it is a pleasure to see you noticing the detail logic of how heat exchange is done in the gek system.  you are correct that we have a single system used everywhere except the air intake.

it is certainly possible to use the "tube in tube" method for the air in / gas out too.  it will work fine, but will present a different sum of pros and cons than the ss tube method.  i considered the solution you are suggesting and went with the tubes as i find they result in a much higher total transfer, as well as particulate separation due to the turbulence in the rising section, while also eliminating a bunch of otherwise close tolerance fits and plumbs.  i actually find the tubes to be a fab "get out of jail free" solution.  flex makes things easy, much easier than a ton of welding.  unfortuantly, they are also the single most expensive to source part on the gek.

if you are going to do the "tube in tube" heat exchange method, remember that you want your flows as perpendicular to heat exchange surfaces as possible. all surfaces build up a laminar layer, which slows heat transfer. simple parallel flow to the walls won't do much to break up this flow. this is why you put turbulators in water heater flue pipes.

i solve this in all our tube in tube exchangers with a series of baffles that make the gas in the gas space pass back and forth across the center tube.  think baffles that look like horseshoes, wrapping about 2/3 of the way around the center tube. this makes somewhat of a standard multipass tube in shell heat exchanger, though with only one tube.  here's what the inside of the drying bucket looks like.  you can do the reactor the same way.

Posted Image

this is the solution we use on the drying bucket, pyrocoil and bek biochar retort. it is the same solution used again and again. it works well and is easy to make. i could also do it for the air intake preheat too, but i find the particulate separation of the tubes, and the ability to start cooling the gas right at the lip of the reduction bell, to be worth the effort.  also, we get the air hotter and the outgoing gas colder for the effort.  we're equally concerned with both

if you want to do the tubes, you can also do them from rolled round tube. you don't need to use the water heater lines. or, you can do straight tubes in a vertical orientation, then put baffles in the gap to get the gas to pass back and forth over them. this is the one that has tempted me recently. you do the vertical tubes like this: http://www.gekgasifi...lery/gek-v07-2/


jim

#3 PresentTeck

PresentTeck

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 60 posts

Posted 19 June 2011 - 04:50 PM

While it might take a little more to fab, I think the benefits outweigh that added cost. For starters you can easily consolidate all your air to one import, this makes shutdown very easy. On top of that it makes cleanup so much easier. The tars can't form around the preheat tubes as they currently do, witch is a pain to clean compared to wiping down a smooth surface.

As for baffling, the way you made the heat exchange is a great way to go, but you could also use large wood chips (hey, they're on hand) as long as they're large enough to let air flow through easily.

another thing, it looks like you have 3/4 circles for the baffles in the heat exchanger, that seems like it would take a lot of space on the layout. If you used half circles instead they could be aranged on the cutting layout like this: ((((((( :   taking up less space, but you might need an extra one in the exchanger to keep the air flow the way you like.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users