Jump to content


- - - - -

Gasification Basics Explained (with graphics)


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 jimmason

jimmason

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 527 posts

Posted 22 March 2009 - 10:26 AM

What it is

Gasification is the use of heat to tranform solid biomass or other carbonaceous solids into a synthetic "natural gas like" flammable fuel.  Through gasification, we can convert nearly any dry organic matter into a clean burning, carbon neutral fuel that can replace most uses of fossil fuel. Whether starting with wood chips or walnut shells, construction debris or agricultural waste, gasification will transform common "waste" into a flexible gaseous fuel you can use to run your internal combustion engine, cooking stove, furnace or flamethrower.

Sound impossible?

Did you know that over one million vehicles in Europe ran onboard gasifiers during WWII to make fuel from wood and charcoal, as liquid fuels were largely unavailable?  Long before there was biodiesel and ethanol, we actually succeeded in a large-scale, alternative fuels redeployment– and one which curiously used only cellulosic biomass, not the oil and sugar based biofuel sources which famously compete with food.

This redeployment was made possible by the gasification of waste biomass, using simple gasifiers about as complex as a traditional wood stove. These small-scale gasifiers are easily reproduced (and improved) today by DIY enthusiasts using simple hammer and wrench technology.  The goal of the GEK project is to show you how to do it, while upgrading the engineering and deployment solutions to something relevant for contemporary users.


How it Works

Gasification is most simply thought of as choked combustion.  It is burning solid fuels like wood or coal without enough air to complete combustion, so the output gas still has combustion potential.  The gas produced by this method goes by a variety of names: “wood gas”, “syngas”, “producer gas”, “town gas”, "generator gas", and others.  It is sometimes also called "biogas", though biogas more typically refers to gas produced via microbes in anaerobic digestion.

You might think of gasification as burning a match, but interrupting the process by piping off the clear gas you see right above the match, not letting it mix with oxygen and complete combustion.  Or you might think of it as running your car engine extremely rich, creating enough heat to break apart the raw fuel, but without enough oxygen to complete combustion, thus sending burnable gasses out the exhaust. This is how a hot rodder gets flames out the exhaust pipes.

The input to gasification is some form of solid carbonaceous material– typically biomass or coal.  All organic carbonaceous material is made up of carbon ©, hydrogen (H), an oxygen (O) atoms– though in a huge variety of molecular forms. The goal in gasification is to break down this wide variety of forms into the simple fuel gasses of H2 and CO– hydrogen and carbon monoxide.

Both hydrogen and carbon monoxide are burnable fuel gasses.  We do not usually think of carbon monoxide as a fuel gas, but it actually has very good combustion characteristics (despite its poor characteristics when interacting with human hemoglobin).   Carbon monoxide and hydrogen have about the same energy density by volume.   Both are very clean burning as they only need to take on one oxygen atom, in one simple step, to arrive at the proper end states of combustion, CO2 and H20. This is why an engine run on syngas can have such clean emissions. The engine becomes the “afterburner” for the more dirty and difficult early stages of combustion that now are handled in the gasifier.


How it Works (again): The 4 Processes of Gasification

Now let’s complicate things slightly. “Proper” gasification is a bit more than just the “choked combustion” summary above. It is actually a series of distinct thermal events put together in serial steps, creating an interdependent chain of thermal-chemical events.  Simple incomplete combustion is a dirty mess. The goal in gasification is to take control of the discrete thermal processes usually mixed together in combustion, and reorganize them towards desired end products. In digital terms, “Gasification is the operating system of fire”. Once you understand its underlying code, you can pull fire apart into its constituent parts, then reassemble it into a wide range of processes and end products.

Gasification is made up for 4 discrete thermal processes: Drying, Pyrolysis, Combustion and Reduction. All 4 of these processes are naturally present in the flame you see burning off a match, though they mix in a manner that renders them invisible to eyes not yet initiated into the mysteries of gasification. Gasification is merely the technology to pull apart and isolate these separate processes, so that we might interrupt the “fire” and pipe the resulting gasses elsewhere.


Posted Image


Two of these processes tend to confuse all newcomers to gasification. Once you understand these two processes, all the others pieces fall in place quickly. These two non-obvious processes are Pyrolysis and Reduction. Here’s the quick cheat sheet.


Pyrolysis:

Pyrolysis is the application of heat to raw biomass, in an absence of air, so as to break it down into charcoal and various tar gasses and liquids.

Biomass begins to “fast decompose” once its temperature rises above around 240C. The biomass breaks down into a combination of solids, liquids and gasses. The solids that remain we commonly call “charcoal”. The gasses and liquids that are released we collectively call “tars”.

The gasses and liquids produced during lower temp pyrolysis are simply fragments of the original biomass that break off with heat. These fragments are the more complicated H, C and O molecules in the biomass that we collectively refer to as volatiles. As the name suggests, volatiles are “reactive”. Or more accurately, they are less strongly bonded in the biomass than the fixed carbon, which is the direct C to C bonds.

Thus in review, pyrolysis is the application of heat to biomass in the absence of air/oxygen. The volatiles in the biomass are “evaporated” off as tars, and the fixed carbon-to-carbon chains are what remains– otherwise known as charcoal.


Reduction:

Reduction is the process stripping of oxygen atoms off completely combusted hydrocarbon (HC) molecules, so as to return the molecules to forms that can burn again. Reduction is the direct reverse process of combustion. Combustion is the combination of an HC molecule with oxygen to release heat. Reduction is the removal of oxygen from an HC molecule by adding heat. Combustion and Reduction are equal and opposite reactions. In fact, in most burning environments, they are both operating simultaneously, in some form of dynamic equilibrium, with repeated movement back and forth between the two states.

Reduction in a gasifier is accomplished by passing carbon dioxide (CO2) or water vapor (H2O) across a bed of red hot char ©. The hot char is highly reactive with oxygen, and thus strips the oxygen off the gasses, and redistributes it to as many single bond sites as possible. The oxygen is more attracted to the bond site on the C than to itself, thus no free oxygen can survive in its usual diatomic O2 form. All available oxygen will bond to available C sites as individual O, until all the oxygen is gone. When all the available oxygen is redistributed as single atoms, reduction stops.

Through this process, CO2 is reduced to CO. And H2O is reduced to H2 and CO. Combustion products become fuel gasses again. And those fuel gasses can then be piped off to do desired work elsewhere.



Posted Image


Combustion and Drying:

These are the most easily understood of the 4 Processes of Gasification.  They do what we think by common understanding, though now they do it in the service of Pyrolysis and Reduction.

Combustion is what generates the heat to run reduction, as well as the CO2 and H2 to be reduced in Reduction.  Combustion can be fueled by either the tar gasses or char from Pyrolysis.  Different reactor types use one or the other or both. In a downdraft gasifier, we are trying to burn the tar gasses from pyrolysis to generate heat to run reduction, as well as the CO2 and H2O to reduce in reduction. The goal in combustion in a downdraft is to get good mixing and high temps so that all the tars are either burned or cracked, and thus will not be present in the outgoing gas. The char bed and reduction contribute a relatively little to the conversion of messy tars to useful fuel gasses. Solving the tar problem is mostly an issue of the reaction dynamics in the combustion zone.

Drying is what removes the moisture in the biomass before it enters Pyrolysis.  All the moisture needs to be (or will be) removed from the fuel before any above 100C processes happen. All of the water in the biomass will get vaporized out of the fuel at some point in the higher temp processes. Where and how this happens is one of the major issues that has to be solved for successful gasification. High moisture content fuel, and/or poor handling of the moisture internally, is one of the most common reasons for failure to produce clean gas.

http://gekgasifier.p...roc_of_gasifica

Edited by jimmason, 22 March 2009 - 10:30 AM.


#2 DanielChisholm

DanielChisholm

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 26 posts

Posted 23 March 2009 - 04:13 PM

These are the two images in Jim's gallery:

http://gekgasifier.c...d=2&pictureid=3
(personally, to the "Combustion" and "Reduction" steps, II would add an indication of what is happening heat-wise.  You could show heat as an additional output of Combustion, and an additional input to to Reduction.  It would be easy to label the reduction heat input as "Heat, 800C+", to also indicate that it is high-temp heat that is needed).


http://gekgasifier.c...d=2&pictureid=1

#3 jimmason

jimmason

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 527 posts

Posted 24 March 2009 - 01:45 AM

daniel, how did  you do that?  i can't figure out how to get the pictures to show up in the thread.  you can insert an image link, but at least linking back to the album page does not do it.

#4 HotAir

HotAir

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 07 December 2009 - 04:18 PM

Excuse a newbie, asking a question I'm sure has been asked dozens of times (I did have a quick search of the site), but looking at Jim Mason's great illustration of the reduction stage in a wood-gasifier above, would the woodgas fuel be a better product if the CO2 was removed before the reduction stage?

I realise this would require potentially complex extra stages, to condense out the water from the CO2+water vapour stream, then reheat it to SH steam temps for reduction.  I'm also assuming, you would need an additional water content to complete the reaction with the charcoal fully, but this could come from a number of places & would seem especially suited if directly coupled with an IC engine - That is, the exhaust gas from the engine is already 'carrying' a large steam content.

#5 Jaliyah

Jaliyah

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 15 March 2010 - 04:42 AM

what a usefull infomation.keep it up.thanks

#6 dacroz

dacroz

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 25 October 2010 - 08:49 PM

Hi, total newbie here...

I have a couple of questions:

(1) As I understand it, the GEKs and BEKs have a variety of different operating modes they can be configured for. Are all four processes shown in the graphic above operational in each mode? Could the diagram be expanded on (detail added?) to show the differences -- if any -- between one and the next?

(2) Suppose I have a free "waste" heat source available that I could use to pyrolize biomass with -- essentially, an oven that I could put a (semi-) closed container filled with biomass in.  Your diagram above shows the output of the pyrolization process to be charcoal and tar (or tarry gas?).  I'm wondering about the quality and energy density of this gas. Could it be cooled and scrubbed and used as a fuel gas as is?

(I can vary the temperature of the "waste" heat source from as low as 400-450F to as high as 750-800F.)

#7 vladim

vladim

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts

Posted 26 October 2010 - 06:57 PM

dacroz said:

Hi, total newbie here...

Could it be cooled and scrubbed and used as a fuel gas as is?

yes tar can be burned separately. But it cant be easy stored or transported to big distances becuase it  consist from very different products like gases (most CO2), acids, alcohols, resins, water. Usualy it is used when is produced, to heat something.

#8 dacroz

dacroz

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 26 October 2010 - 08:44 PM

thanks, vladim,

Immediate use wouldn't be a problem. My interest would be to use it to generate electricity as it is generated -- by feeding it into the air intake of a diesel engine, for example.

What I'm not sure of is the energy density of the gas, or whether it could be used in an IC engine without damaging it -- what it would take to scrub it adequately.

#9 dacroz

dacroz

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 26 October 2010 - 11:37 PM

I think I found some answers to my questions here.  It appears that the short answers are:
1. It's complicated", and
2. It depends.

Off to read more.

And I just want to add thanks for such an awesome resource!

#10 jimmason

jimmason

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 527 posts

Posted 27 October 2010 - 12:41 AM

dacroz said:

I think I found some answers to my questions here.  It appears that the short answers are:
1. It's complicated", and
2. It depends.

Off to read more.

And I just want to add thanks for such an awesome resource!

welcome to biomass thermal conversion.  despite some rare appearances of simplicity to the contrary, the general answer tends to be, "it's complicated" and "it depends" (especially when pyrolysis is involved).

jim

#11 vladim

vladim

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts

Posted 27 October 2010 - 03:46 PM

dacroz said:

thanks, vladim,
by feeding it into the air intake of a diesel engine, for example.

What I'm not sure of is the energy density of the gas, or whether it could be used in an IC engine without damaging it

oh no... only not in IC engine, the acids will damage engine pieces and resins will slagging fuel flow. Energy density of the tar is higher than gengas due to it contains more complex chemical elements. Here you can see a list of products from wood (pine) pyrolysis:

Charcol - 37,83%
Gas:
     CO2 - 10,13%
     C2H4 - 0,23%
     CO    - 3,74%
     CH4  - 0,59%
Methanol - 0,88%
Acetone  - 0,18%
Methyl C3H6O2   - 0,01%
Acetic acid - 3,5%
Resin   - 11,79%
Water - 22,27%
Other organic elements - 8,03%
Loses  - 0,82%

You can burn it to produce steam for an electric turbine

#12 dacroz

dacroz

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 28 October 2010 - 09:55 PM

Quote

oh no... only not in IC engine, the acids will damage engine pieces and resins will slagging fuel flow. Energy density of the tar is higher than gengas due to it contains more complex chemical elements. Here you can see a list of products from wood (pine) pyrolysis:

Hmmm... Now I'm wondering how to reconcile that with the following, (found here):

Quote

We have tested a number of feedstocks in addition to cellulosic materials using slow pyrolysis. The results are strikingly similar for most waste sources, as noted above. BTU content of the gas stream was in the 850 to 1,250 per scf range, and the gas, once scrubbed, easily runs in an internal combustion engine.

So I guess what I need to pin down is what that scrubbing consists of. See what is involved, get an idea of how complicated and/or expensive it is.

#13 jimmason

jimmason

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 527 posts

Posted 28 October 2010 - 10:25 PM

i would question the rosy assessment of scrubbing pyrolysis gas to a useful fuel gas.  scrubbing means filtering by means of a liquid, usually water.

scrubbing doesn't really solve any problem, it just moves it somewhere else.  the end of scrubbing dirty pyrolysis gas is tarry black bong water.  it smells disgusting, is rather toxic, and is a big hassle to dispose of.

furthermore, it is fuel.  you otherwise wanted to use it.  unfortunately it is like pouring glue in an engine.  it bonds tight all sliding mechanical surfaces it touches.  think pouring cresote and asphalt into your oil fill.

while in principle pyrolysis gas can be cleaned up to the point you can put it in an engine, in practice this is not usually logistically feasible.  it is one of the larger holes into which lots of money and effort gets poured around biomass thermal conversion, mostly with zero useful outcome.  don't believe the power point to the contrary.

if you want clean gas to run and engine, or to burn for heat without lots of problems in piping and pumping, make clean gas in the beginning.  band aids after the fact get very complicated and expensive.  and they are usually what breaks the project in the end.

jim

#14 dacroz

dacroz

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 28 October 2010 - 11:31 PM

Thanks, Jim,

(Private message sent, to avoid cluttering up this item...)

#15 fuel spiller

fuel spiller

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 103 posts

Posted 10 April 2011 - 04:22 PM

I just wanted to re post this here for those who missed it. Every time I read this I see something new. I think this would be best to read AFTER you think you understand gasification.
Best forum ever! thanks for the intel. Neal B

original post by Jay Martin (years ago)

I do not mean to be hijacking a thread here. My discussion does follow this line of thought. I want to post it here for discussion before moving to the wiki as a more permanent resource.

The process of gasification is not a single process. It is a series of 3 distinct chemical processes in addition to a significant amount of both mass and heat transfer. I will try to focus on the the three chemical processes (which are highly driven by the mass and thermal transfer processes).

The first chemical process is pyrolysis - the breaking down of the longer chain hyrdocarbons in the biomass (wood) structure into shorter chains that are volatized (made into a gas). These chains must be volatized before they can enter the second chemical process, combustion. The process of pyrolysis is endothermic, i.e. it requires heat to make it work. In most gasifiers this heat (energy) comes from the combustion process. By tieing these two processes so closely together, it can be difficult to control both chemical processes. This is probably where the moisture content of fuel has its largest impact on the performance of the system. Water has a high heat capacity that sucks the energy out of the system, not allowing the fuel entering into pyrolysis process to achieve as high a temperature. Pyrolysis of hemicellulose begins at 440F and contineus through 620F, cellulose begins at 620F and continues through 710F, and the last component of biomasss, lignin begins at 480F and continues to 930F.

The pyrolysis of cellulose is a complicated series of reactions that cleave the molecules into gaseous fragments and condensation reactions that produce char (one of the end products we want for reduction later on). One very important observation of the pyrolysis of cellulose is that higher temperatures favor the generation of more volatiles while lower temperature favor char production. The pyrolysis of cellulose, on average, will produce 66% tar by weight, 11% water, 5% char, and 6% carbon dioxide. The remainder are a bunch of longer chain hydrocarbons including methanol and acetic acid.

The pyrolysis of lignin generates the gases carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane and propane in percentages of 50, 10, 38, and 2 respectively, though the majority of the weight (about 55%) is converted into char.

At this point, the reaction of the gases can be separated from the char, though in the imbert type reactors, the reactions are all nearly colocated, possibly making the control of the chemical processes more difficult. The gases produced, specifically the tars, from the solid phase pryolysis must go through a gaseous phase pyrolysis to cleave the long chains into shorter ones. The activation energy to cleave a C-C bond is about 368 KJ/mole. The next higher bond energy is the C-H bond at about 410 KJ/mole. The energy needed to dissociate H20 to H and OH is 498 KJ/mole. The lowest energy chains are broken first on average since they are the easist to break. Excess water in this reaction zone continues to suck energy out of the system that could be used to cleave the longer hydrocarbon chains into shorter ones. If this zone starts to cool too much, the dissociated chains can begin to recombine.

The combustion process is defined as the combination of oxygen and fuel ultimately producing carbon dioxide and water. All of the previously described pyrolysis reactions do not require any oxygen - they are entirely driven by heat addition to the process. Though it is possible for direct combustion of longer chain hydrocarbons, the reaction favors combusting the shorter chains. Most likely, the energy released from the combustion of the shorter chains is used to pyrolyse the longer chains into shorter ones. An increased quantity of hydrogen in the gas stream tends to increase the combustion rate due to its use in the chain termination reactions.

The reduction of carbon dioxide and water by the hot char bed is the primary chemical process that generates wood gas for later combustion. The reaction of carbon and carbon dioxide to create two carbon monoxide molecules is defined by the classic Boudouard reaction. This is a highly endorthermic reaction with an equilibrium constant of 0.011 at 800K, 1.9 at 1100K and 57.1 at 1200 K. Water reacts with the carbon bed by first dissociating into H and OH and then 2 OH react with a C to create CO and H20. These OH radicals are also a common product of the pyrolysis processes described previously. It is also possible for oxygen (02) to be directly absorbed by the activated carbon to create carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide.

The bottom line in this discussion is in terms of required chemical processes, combustion is not necessary to generate wood gas. If sufficient energy is dumped into the system to completely pyrolyze the biomass into char, carbon dioxide, water, and short chain hydrocarbons (such as methane and propane), this resulting gas stream can be directly injected into an activated hot char bed for the reduction of the water and carbon dioxide. The resulting gas stream should prove to be an effective fuel for internal cumbustion engines (ICE) or other thermal processes. The trouble with this theory is the pyrolysis and reduction processes require significant amounts of heat (energy). Without an external source, this heat must be generated by combustion. The use of heat reclaimers (such as the pyrocoil) can provide some benefit by reducing the amount of energy that needs to produced by combustion, thus leaving more energy in the wood gas stream on a weight basis of the fuel.

Some personal opinions I have at this point is that the combustion process needs to be divorced from the pyrolysis and reduction processes as much as is possible. It is the process that can be used to control the other two by controlling the amount of air that is injected into the system. The overall process should also be "observable" (i.e. as an outiside viewer we know what is going on inside) by taking temperature measurements of the processes at many different points. I think more research is needed on the rates at which these reactions occur. Do we support enough residence time for the reactions to occur? in addition to can we add the required energy to the points that need them? How much energy can we reclaim from both the hot gas stream exiting from the reduction zone and from the exhaust gas of an ICE to be reintroduced into the gasification process.

I feel that the positive results that APL has had from gasifying walnut shells results from two points: 1) their low moisture content and 2) the high lignin (and thus resulting carbon) content. Walnut shells create fewer gases when pyrolized and have more activated carbon to reduce the gases that are combusted. One option those that gasifier wood chips should consider is adding a percentage of char directly to the fuel to provide the needed additional carbon for the reduction of water and carbon dioxide.

Respectfully submitted to the masses for discussion

Jay Martin




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users